Asus N750JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus N750JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JK
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 148
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 424
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.6
3% 9 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC81605
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 338 238 154 62 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 442
Write 346
Mixed 276
SusWrite 199
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 28.8
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 32
28% 40 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 74.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 73.6
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QHO-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JK Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback