Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '17 at 17:24
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 543
70% 530 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
XFX(1682 2990) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 90GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
Read 196
Write 84.3
Mixed 102
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 14.4
89% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 27.5
42% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
85GB free
Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 59
Mixed 58.3
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34%
Great: 35%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
797GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 92.2
Mixed 8.07
79% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.56
4K Write 5.96
4K Mixed 0.46
224% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback