Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-C R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 23:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 69
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 587
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 841
52% 841 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 62.5
54% 65.7 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 63.6
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 448 452 461 462 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 460
Mixed 420
SusWrite 455
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 40.7
138% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 218
170% 231 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
635GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 73
SusWrite 94.7
132% 100 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
175% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 65%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-22HXZT1 500GB
73GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 27.8
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
48GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 11 8 7.6 12 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 24
Write 3.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 8.6
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback