Acer Aspire A515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Grumpy_PK
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200407
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 20:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 150
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 219
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.4
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 12
8% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 140 141 141 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 946
Write 377
Mixed 581
SusWrite 145
113% 512 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.5
173% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 327
232% 294 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
298GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 95 93 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 89.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 95.2
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-43 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback