Jingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Jingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407 (all builds)
Motherboard	Jingsha/Kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407
Memory	30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '20 at 20:07
Run Duration	78 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 770 69% 581 Pts	64-Core 1,559 96% 1,559 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (88^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 62.2 55% 65.3 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 62.3 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,235 Write 2,099 Mixed 1,693 448% 2,009 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 84.7 282% 99.8 MB/s	DQ Read 796 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 710 516% 675 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 2x16GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.3% Good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 21.4 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Beta 2.0407 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 110%

UFO

System: Jingsha/kllisre X99 Beta 2.0407

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	3x
Xeon E5-1630 v3IntelBench 75%, 1,907 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 56%, 142 samples	2x
Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBHyperX $90Bench 82%, 9,857 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16