MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7808
MotherboardMSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 167
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 326
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8566) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 63
Parallax 39.5
34% 48 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 36.5
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 81 74 73 59 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 467
Write 438
Mixed 332
SusWrite 89.2
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 36.5
133% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 165
169% 272 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
138GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 90 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 125
Write 106
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 87.8
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 04CB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) - $58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback