TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP p6-2414esm

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2414esm  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 18:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 119
52% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 172
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 52.5%
 Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90BE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.02%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 386 382 386 347 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 371
Mixed 366
SusWrite 372
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 42.7
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 226
174% 236 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 95.3%
 Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
499GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 154 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 140
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 154
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 90.6%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 23.6%
 Great: 20%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback