Lenovo 10AD002CGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10AD002CGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 187
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 372
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 466 430 430 486 486 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 340
Mixed 304
SusWrite 456
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 46.9
124% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback