Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 13:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 467
59% 450 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 74.9
71% 83.1 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 70.4
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 30 32 33 30 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 384
Write 256
Mixed 346
SusWrite 50.2
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 33.8
122% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 187
166% 246 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
910GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 171 170 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 172
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 170
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU88C-26N190A 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback