HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory44.6 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '17 at 20:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 470
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.51
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.9
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.9
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
916GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 82.6
Write 76.4
Mixed 81.6
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.42
112% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 300GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 218
Mixed 183
153% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 3.97
4K Mixed 0.89
219% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 123%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 82GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback