AMD Hudson-D3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAMD Hudson-D3L  (all builds)
MotherboardZillion A88F2AL2
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170219
Uptime17.3 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 10:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 49.2
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 32.7
34% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 43
8-Core 149
10% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 51.9
3% 51.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 66.2
55% 68.3 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 69
Splatting 66.3
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 202 212 206 208 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 242
Write 290
Mixed 172
SusWrite 202
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 20.8
73% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 37.8
31% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.8
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hudson-D3L Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AMD Hudson-D3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback