Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 03:47
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 309
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 67.1
57% 70.1 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 66.6
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 260 290 301 287 294 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 408
Mixed 400
SusWrite 272
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 49.1
160% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Yeston Extreme 60G 60GB
43GB free
Firmware: Q1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 229 252 257 35 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 471
Write 262
Mixed 307
SusWrite 162
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 19.3
112% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 25.2
69% 142 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 97 100 98 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 92.6
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 95.1
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LVM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 117 119 119 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 115
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
63GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 80 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 87.9
Write 73.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 79.2
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
170GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 70 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 70.5
Write 46.3
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 68.6
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 84%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
883GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 85 84 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 84.1
100% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 42%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
42GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 79 70 54 63 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 94.1
Write 93.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 71.2
104% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-1600C11-8GIS 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback