Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4115 544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 28.9 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 104 33% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 210 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.37% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5.8 4% 4.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
QM2T-128 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 89 124 131 122 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	Read 395 Write 134 Mixed 144 SusWrite 118 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 7 59% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 54.7 64% 111 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 11.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	483x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	462x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16