Asrock H87 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130703
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 06:50
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 204
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 360
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 41.4
35% 43.3 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 36.8
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 160 294 292 254 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 450
Write 381
Mixed 361
SusWrite 226
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 39.7
124% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 183
149% 220 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 125%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
22GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 118 111 128 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 305
Write 107
Mixed 173
SusWrite 117
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 25.8
89% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 136
101% 136 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 82%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
104GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 170 133 130 133 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 433
Write 397
Mixed 255
SusWrite 136
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 30.5
98% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 124
118% 192 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
45GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 164 90 85 103 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 448
Write 377
Mixed 306
SusWrite 113
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 29.9
106% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 60.1
86% 169 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
135GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 166 295 294 253 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 445
Write 370
Mixed 369
SusWrite 228
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 35.4
115% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 133
120% 193 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 125%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
475GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 87 85 86 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 56
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 83.7
89% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX6GX3M3C1600C7 0215 CMX6GX3M3C1600C7 0215 CMX6GX3M3C1600C7 0215 CM3X2G1600C8D 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback