MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 87
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 829
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 160
Parallax 158
128% 158 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 141
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 512GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 339 88 168 241 239 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,732
Write 1389
Mixed 839
SusWrite 267
286% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 73.6
202% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 1,105
809% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 237%
Great: 320%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
112GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 219 217 220 214 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 475
Mixed 274
SusWrite 225
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 48.3
145% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 231
204% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
159GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 130 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 171
Write 144
Mixed 100
SusWrite 128
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86%
Great: 109%
Sabrent Disk Device 120GB
102GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 142
Mixed 169
SusWrite 94.8
200% 157 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 17.4
1,504% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,562% 20 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Sabrent Disk Device 500GB
286GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 95.2
Write 99.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 94.1
105% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 140%
Sabrent Disk Device 1TB
920GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 1.4 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 182
Write 179
Mixed 101
SusWrite 1.7
143% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
141% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 38.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 33
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback