Lenovo 7052A9G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 7052A9G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 469
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 31.8
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 22.7
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 309 308 307 309 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 456
Write 397
Mixed 373
SusWrite 307
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 37.1
122% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 341
255% 339 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 167 167 166 168 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 164
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052A9G Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052A9G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback