Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2125-$152
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 12.3
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 137
39% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 188
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 22
14% 21.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 25.4
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190802a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 177 163 171 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 149
Write 161
Mixed 164
SusWrite 171
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 15.8
60% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 22.3
22% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
808GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 157 168 160 164 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 156
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 164
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 383
10% 383 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback