Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '17 at 09:18
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 403
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2345) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 32.8
22% 29.9 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 22
Splatting 34.8
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 374
Write 188
Mixed 252
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 4.34
59% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 3.59
11% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
63GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 163
Mixed 148
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.3
98% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback