HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory248.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 08:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 39
2-Core 76.8
40% 61.3 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 365
30% 263 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 19.8
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 755 767 779 771 779 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 824
Mixed 499
SusWrite 767
168% 749 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 36.4
120% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 339
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 136%
Great: 331%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
347GB free
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1245 1249 1266 1284 1268 1277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 1,203
Mixed 555
SusWrite 1,265
242% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 39
124% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 357
261% 342 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 183%
Great: 331%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
240GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 87.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 102
54% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HCC541010A9E630 1TB
281GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 73
Write 72.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 74
43% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 36.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback