Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 07:07
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 95.7
45% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 249
26% 211 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 60.3
50% 62.6 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 60.4
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 160 141 119 73 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41% Average
Read 324
Write 278
Mixed 257
SusWrite 126
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 13.2
61% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 20.4
23% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41%
Great: 87%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$50
404GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 19 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 CT102464BA160B.M16 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback