MSI Z68A-GD80 (MS-7672)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7672
MotherboardMSI Z68A-GD80 (MS-7672)  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 20:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31235
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 153
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 446
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P3000
MSI(1462 7672) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2867
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 445 437 432 433 439 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,142
Write 429
Mixed 395
SusWrite 434
132% 600 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 29.7
106% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 183
168% 260 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 118%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-GD80 (MS-7672) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-GD80 (MS-7672)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback