Lenovo 80XR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80XR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171023
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 19:31
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 83.2
30% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 87.5
8-Core 78.7
11% 83.1 Pts
64-Core 71.7
4% 71.7 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Legend(17AA 39BF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.5
2% 1.83 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128 GB 1TB
986GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 15 17 16 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.57% Terrible
Read 102
Write 21.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 16.8
10% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.5 MB/s
WD WD1000LPCX-24VHAT0 500GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 17 21 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 84.4
Write 91.8
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 20.3
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
SMI USB DISK 4GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.6 7.4 6.7 7 7.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.9
9% 7.03 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XR Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback