Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '20 at 02:09
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 902 87% 714 Pts	64-Core 1,332 82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 1357) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.3% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 69.2 56% 71.6 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 67.3 Splatting 58.4 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 354 359 356 357 356 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 430 Mixed 424 SusWrite 356 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 56.5 187% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 196 148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 33.5 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 31.2 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,657x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,269x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,241x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,839x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16