Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 20:28
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 907
86% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M3 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 178 186 196 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 466
Write 200
Mixed 215
SusWrite 192
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 25.4
90% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 131
116% 175 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
229GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 457 456 456 456 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 403
SusWrite 456
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 58.4
192% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 138 140 139 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 159
Write 134
Mixed 106
SusWrite 138
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1.1
14% 5.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
3% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,676
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback