IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914E6G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemIBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914E6G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00AM544
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 03 '14 at 07:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 114
35% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 374
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qnap iSCSI Storage 3.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18% Very poor
Read 66.5
Write 106
Mixed 76.5
19% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 8.86
4K Mixed 7.29
25% 7.79 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 19.6
16% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 18%
Great: 80%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1TB
716GB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.1% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 93.3
Mixed 91.2
17% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.38
4K Write 9.67
4K Mixed 5.74
24% 7.6 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 18.8
14% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 71%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 32% Great: 54%
IBM ServeRAID M1115 599GB
510GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 135
Mixed 179
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.61
121% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback