Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190815
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '20 at 07:25
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 84 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 876 80% 672 Pts	64-Core 894 55% 894 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A7) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 224 Parallax 159 121% 177 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 139 Splatting 118 116% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$173 1,585 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126KB SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 208 213 134 215 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 470 Write 421 Mixed 308 SusWrite 196 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 34.8 134% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 124 107% 163 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 201GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 117 118 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 107 Write 103 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 116 71% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 728GB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 66 68 68 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 86 Write 90.5 Mixed 59 SusWrite 66.4 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 2x8GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $535

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16