Lenovo 17045UG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 17045UG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 17045UG
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 21:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo L2400
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 54.1
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 32.2
25% 33.9 Pts
4-Core 30.2
8-Core 32
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 31.5
2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 53 45 42 47 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 114
Write 90.4
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 47.7
19% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 12.1
46% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 48.1
43% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback