Gigabyte B360M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B360M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B360M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 07:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 258
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 498
67% 500 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1596 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 49.5
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 45
40% 48.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 39.9
34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Realtek SATA Drive 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8201d05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 61 67 59 50 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 367
Write 140
Mixed 115
SusWrite 58.5
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 21.3
92% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 67.8
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 61.9
45% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 154 154 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 98.2
Write 97.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 153
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M DS3H Builds (Compare 5,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360M DS3H - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback