Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 00:58
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 74
2-Core 144
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 408
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
MSI(1462 8A96) 2GB
CLim: 942 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21.5
13% 18.5 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 16
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 387 407 412 414 412 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 411
Mixed 387
SusWrite 394
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 39.5
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 224
172% 233 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
220GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 96 95 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 100
Mixed 62
SusWrite 98
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
WDC WD10 EVDS-63U8B0 1TB
33GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 33 33 32 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 26.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 32
38% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback