Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 171
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 478
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 101
Parallax 103
95% 107 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 97.8
Splatting 91.4
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 80 85 85 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 302
Write 220
Mixed 226
SusWrite 92.7
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 26.3
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 201
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
107GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 311 316 320 319 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 400
Write 384
Mixed 386
SusWrite 310
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 37
121% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 338
256% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback