HP 23-g001br

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 23-g001br  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B0D
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 05:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130T-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 161
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 226
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710A
HP(103C 2B0D) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 60 67 77 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 111
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 73
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-g001br Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-g001br

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback