Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 03:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4620-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 214
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 326
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Дисковый накопитель 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 473
Mixed 344
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.6
209% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 308
245% 342 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 109%
Samsung SSD 250GB
32GB free
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 480
Mixed 442
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 68.3
234% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 126%
Дисковый накопитель 1TB
380GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 124
Write 75.8
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 104
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 1302 PSD416G26662 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback