Alienware M14xR1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware M14xR1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M14xR1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 142
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 349
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 0491) 1.5GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8912
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 0.3
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 57 54 62 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 97.6
Write 96.3
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 65.2
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-PB 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M14xR1 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M14xR1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback