Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 140 2-Core 273 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 782 76% 624 Pts	64-Core 876 54% 876 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5200 527 User benchmarks, average bench 80% HP(103C 842D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5709 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.2% Very good	Lighting 99 Reflection 124 Parallax 109 81% 111 fps	MRender 78.6 Gravity 99.5 Splatting 98.1 76% 92.1 fps
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 95%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,535 Write 1,764 Mixed 1,172 333% 1,491 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 84 276% 94.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,170 DQ Write 973 DQ Mixed 1,072 803% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2B2 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2B2 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 79GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 32767, 32767, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 24.4 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	259x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	128x
Quadro P5200NvidiaBench 80%, 527 samples	119x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	120x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	81x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	79x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	40x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16