Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '20 at 18:30
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 243 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 524 54% 432 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,953 Write 1,906 Mixed 1,417 392% 1,759 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 62 208% 73.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 870 DQ Mixed 909 693% 938 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 3,312 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 285GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 424 425 422 427 426 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 442 Mixed 372 SusWrite 424 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 43.8 147% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 355 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 154GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 156 156 156 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 155 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$30 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 26.5 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 22.9 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,002x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	254x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16