Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$72 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 149 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 207 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8439) 1GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 12 Parallax 12.1 7% 11.1 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB 8,287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 62 60 59 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 68 Write 66.3 Mixed 42 SusWrite 61.8 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 43%
HUAWEI MMC Storage 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 5.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 5 SusWrite 5.5 7% 5.25 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 51% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M391B5673GB0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	396x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	80x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278