Lenovo 20AWS2X81Y

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20AWS2X81Y  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWS2X81Y
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 01:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 130
55% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 209
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 133 22 22 41 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 441
Write 338
Mixed 9
SusWrite 52.4
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
19% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback