Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 01:12
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 208
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 702
60% 515 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 91.5
55% 73.8 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 46.8
48% 60.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1776 903 605 610 612 610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2153
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 853
338% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 74.4
240% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 714
513% 667 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 242%
Great: 276%
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
155GB free
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 281 281 281 281 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 370
Write 278
Mixed 258
SusWrite 281
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 33
117% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 175
158% 240 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Patriot Burst 480GB
359GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 354 97 95 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 445
Write 252
Mixed 316
SusWrite 188
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 31.4
128% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 183
163% 243 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
226GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 12.7
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 87.7
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 59%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 146 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 95
SusWrite 145
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 144 145 141 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 157
Write 127
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 143
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 43W7575 42D0003IBM 750GB
372GB free
Firmware: 3.AEP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 46.7
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 66.2
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 44.7
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 21
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback