PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 20.3 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 12 '20 at 00:20 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8681) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 104 86 54 65 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
178GB free
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 212 214 217 217 217 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB
217GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 51 42 26 32 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 68GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 51 41 27 31 MB/s
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
114GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |