Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 201
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 498
55% 432 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 6.6 19 6.2 22 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 151
Write 22.9
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 31.5
13% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 10.7
56% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 16
12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL4G24C16U4B.8FB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback