Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 44.9 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 113 41% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 226 14% 226 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2009XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 374 386 387 383 388 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 457 Write 152 Mixed 376 SusWrite 380 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 21.2 100% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 41.4 89% 177 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	61x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	61x

RAM
DDR4 NB 8G 2400 1x8GBUnknownBench 26%, 139 samples	33x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	10x
WPBC24D408SWM-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 25%, 15 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16