Bleujour KUBB-OCTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBleujour KUBB-OCTO  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 203
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 298
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 12.9
9% 11 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeGN 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 233 247 242 256 258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,813
Write 1,034
Mixed 1,073
SusWrite 278
232% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 74.3
259% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 705
547% 746 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 204%
Great: 211%
Jmicron JMS583 256GB
120GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 270 265 267 266 264 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GF2.4000B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KUBB-OCTO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Bleujour KUBB-OCTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback