Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 140
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 644
67% 541 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 61.9
50% 61.9 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 61.9
51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 202%
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 43.6
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 63.6
36% 56.4 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 33.9
33% 41.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD My Passport 25F3 1TB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 355 364 372 383 385 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 347
Write 176
Mixed 238
SusWrite 371
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 23.7
72% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.8
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 172
120% 146 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B48583236363643313553342F31364720202020 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 31
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback