Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime4 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 199
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 629
63% 511 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
Asus(1043 0484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 86.2
50% 72.5 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 44.2
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2.5TB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 41 0.2 22 32 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 521
Write 58.5
Mixed 115
SusWrite 31.1
39% 181 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 8.8
49% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 134
126% 207 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 104%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
664GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 39 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 88.4
108% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 31.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback