Asus Z240IC-H170

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus Z240IC-H170  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z240IC-H170
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '17 at 07:19
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 198
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 569
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 86C6) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7633
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.9
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 98.6
Mixed 82.1
69% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.1
49% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 13.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240IC-H170 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Z240IC-H170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback