HP 700-215xt

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP 700-215xt  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 20:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$129
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 577
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Device(1B0A 90C5) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 335.58
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.3
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Dis 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 412 22 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 484
Write 403
Mixed 377
SusWrite 149
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 24.7
143% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 49.7
93% 179 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-215xt Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-215xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback