Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 94.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 504
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 61.9
52% 64.4 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 67
Splatting 61.8
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 296 295 306 302 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 299
Mixed 274
SusWrite 300
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 34.6
128% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 233
202% 299 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
361GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 87 93 114 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 103
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 68.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 64.8
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 69%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
7GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.5 9.9 8.9 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 5.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.4
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 9%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.6 3.5 3.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.5
6% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-002.A01LF 4x1GB
4 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 32.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback