Medion MD34397/C909

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34397/C909  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B350A4-EM
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190220
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 17:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 188
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 617
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 146
Parallax 218
114% 168 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 142
Splatting 94.4
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 442 502 489 498 487 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,184
Write 1,671
Mixed 953
SusWrite 479
241% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 52
168% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 687
499% 660 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 158%
Great: 218%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 130 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 143
Write 146
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 130
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 91.2
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 91.8
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34397/C909 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34397/C909

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback