Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 838
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Sapphire(174B 1071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 109
Parallax 0.3
82% 70.2 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 98.7
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 20 110 73 23 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 239
Write 89.3
Mixed 160
SusWrite 76.2
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 26.6
121% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 93.1
82% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 85%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
415GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 843 843 845 844 845 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 1,982
Mixed 1,593
SusWrite 912
365% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 78.3
285% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,424
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1,280
965% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 282%
Great: 288%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 297 297 297 296 263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 459
Mixed 406
SusWrite 305
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 46.7
157% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 261
197% 269 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
442GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 170
Write 157
Mixed 107
SusWrite 142
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D2400C14 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback