Apple iMac9,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F2218FA9
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 09:40
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8335
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 80.1
43% 65 Pts
4-Core 81.1
8-Core 81
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 120
Apple(106B 0633) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.1
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 177 178 150 185 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 222
Write 9.8
Mixed 179
SusWrite 172
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 15
63% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 19.2
26% 44 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac9,1 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback